Early experience with percutaneous balloon kyphoplasty for treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture in Nepal: A case report (2024)

  • Journal List
  • Clin Case Rep
  • v.11(9); 2023 Sep
  • PMC10460932

As a library, NLM provides access to scientific literature. Inclusion in an NLM database does not imply endorsem*nt of, or agreement with, the contents by NLM or the National Institutes of Health.
Learn more: PMC Disclaimer | PMC Copyright Notice

Early experience with percutaneous balloon kyphoplasty for treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture in Nepal: A case report (1)

Link to Publisher's site

Clin Case Rep. 2023 Sep; 11(9): e7852.

Published online 2023 Aug 27. doi:10.1002/ccr3.7852

PMCID: PMC10460932

PMID: 37645056

Paras Thapa,Early experience with percutaneous balloon kyphoplasty for treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture in Nepal: A case report (2)1 Madhur Bhattarai,2 Basanta SharmaPaudel,2 Prakash Sharma,2 Pratiksha Kunwar,3 Sushil Poudel,4 Saru Koirala,4 Amit Pradhanang,5 Brendan J. Klein,6 and Farrokh Farrokhi7

Author information Article notes Copyright and License information PMC Disclaimer

Associated Data

Data Availability Statement

Abstract

Key Clinical Message

Balloon kyphoplasty is a promising treatment option for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures with posterior cortical defect, offering pain relief, vertebral height restoration, and low risk of cement leakage.

Abstract

Millions of people worldwide suffer from osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs) annually, which cause pain and functional limitations, particularly in the elderly. Conservative treatments such as pain management, rest, and medication are frequently used, while surgical options such as vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty are considered. We present a case of 68‐year‐old female with vertebral compression fracture of L1 vertebra with posterior cortical defect and posterior wall retropulsion. She was treated successfully with balloon kyphoplasty. Kyphoplasty appears to be a better option than vertebroplasty in cases with posterior cortical defect due to lower chance of cement leakage.

Keywords: balloon kyphoplasty, compression fracture, osteoporosis, posterior cortical defect, vertebra

Percutaneous balloon kyphoplasty performed under fluoroscopic guidance.

Early experience with percutaneous balloon kyphoplasty for treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture in Nepal: A case report (3)

1. INTRODUCTION

Osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture (OVCF) is a common and serious consequence of osteoporosis, impacting individuals aged ≥50 years, with an estimated prevalence ranging from 30% to 50%.1 Despite the prevalence of OVCFs, there is currently no accepted treatment plan for patients who suffer from this condition. An acute OVCF is typically treated with a combination of pain management, activity modification, patient education, and osteoporosis treatment. Conservative treatment options include things like rest and/or medication, while surgical ones like vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty may also be taken into account.2 Conservative treatment for vertebral compression fractures typically involves immobilization with a back brace, patient‐specific analgesia, and medication for osteoporosis. The back brace provides stability and reduces the need for surgery, but may not be well tolerated by older patients. Regular radiological monitoring is necessary to detect any worsening of displacement, malunion, or nonunion that may cause persistent pain. This approach can be indicated for fractures with less than 20° kyphosis and 25% loss in height.3 But in elderly patients, prolonged bed rest and lack of physical activity can elevate risks of pneumonia, pressure ulcers (decubitus ulcers), venous thromboembolism, and mortality.4 Percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) and percutaneous balloon kyphoplasty (BK) have been developed to alleviate pain associated with fractures and restoring vertebral height. These procedures have demonstrated effectiveness in providing short‐term pain relief.5 Of these interventional treatments, vertebroplasty is generally considered a simpler procedure as it involves a direct injection of cement into the fractured vertebra. Kyphoplasty, with the additional step of balloon inflation, may require more technical expertise and specialized equipment and is costlier. However, vertebroplasty, has the significant risk of cement leakage, with one of the potential complications being leakage into the spinal canal. Kyphoplasty, a minimally invasive procedure for neurologically intact patients, has demonstrated effectiveness in numerous cases, and can offer rapid pain relief and less cement leakage. Kyphoplasty may be preferred when there is a significant vertebral collapse or deformity or cortical defect. We present here the pioneering example of interventional radiology performing percutaneous balloon kyphoplasty on a patient with OVCF in Nepal.

2. CASE PRESENTATION

A 68‐year‐old female, presented to the emergency room with 6 weeks history of increasing back pain, limiting her ability to sit and stand for the last 30 days. The pain was constant at rest and increased with activities such as sitting, standing, or using the bathroom.

Her medical history was notable for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) for 12 years, hypothyroidism for 5 years, hypertension (HTN) for 3 years, and diabetes mellitus (DM) for 1 year. She was receiving medical management for all her comorbidities.

Tenderness was noted in the L1 region of her back. There was no step‐up deformity or swelling. Lower limb examination showed normal tone, bulk, power, reflexes, and sensation bilaterally. Radiological findings from computed tomography (CT) scan of the lumbar‐sacral spine revealed diffuse osteoporosis of the dorso‐lumbar vertebra and central wedging compression fracture at the L1 vertebra and mild retropulsion of the posterior wall, leading to a mild narrowing of the central spinal canal. Additionally, there were cortical defects in the posterior aspect (Figure1). The L4 vertebra also showed anterior wedging with an irregular superior subchondral surface.

Open in a separate window

FIGURE 1

CT scan, bone window sagittal view showing osteoporotic vertebra with compression fracture of L1 vertebra (red arrow) with posterior cortical defect (black arrow).

Based on the clinical presentation, examination findings, and imaging results, she was diagnosed with an osteoporotic L1 fracture (ASIA impairment scale E). She was scheduled for kyphoplasty rather than vertebroplasty, as there was a posterior cortical defect.

The procedure, performed under fluoroscopic guidance, involved accessing the L1 vertebra through the pedicles from both sides. Since there were few cortical defects in the posterior aspect balloon was inflated to create a cavity, and approximately 5 mL polymethylmethacrylate cement was injected slowly (Figure2). There was not any cement leakage or clinical complications.

Open in a separate window

FIGURE 2

(A) Access to vertebral bodies with fluoroscopic assistance. (B) Inflating a balloon under fluoroscopic guidance. (C) Injection of cement polymethylmethacrylate. (D) Cement injection from both pedicles.

Post‐operative imaging confirmed the presence of a good amount of cement in the affected vertebra. One day after the procedure, she reported significant pain relief and was able to sit in bed. By postoperative day two, she began mobilizing with support and reported reduced pain. Her vital signs remained stable throughout her hospital stay. No complications were seen.

Given her improved condition and stable neurology, she was discharged from the hospital. She was advised to take paracetamol tablets (1 gm) thrice daily for 3 days, followed by as‐needed (SOS) for pain relief. Additionally, she was prescribed gabapentin capsules (100 mg) orally twice daily for a duration of 1 month to manage neuropathic pain. Her medications for the comorbid diseases were continued. She was instructed to take a weekly dose of vitamin D (60,000 IU) for 4 weeks. At the time of discharge, her condition remained stable, and she was able to ambulate with support. On follow‐up at 2 months, she was pain‐free and ambulating without difficulty.

3. DISCUSSION

Osteoporotic vertebral fractures can result in height loss, spinal deformities, pain, restricted mobility, and disability. Pain associated with acute fractures is attributed to instability at the fracture site and is typically less pronounced at rest but exacerbated during physical activity.6

Diagnosis of a vertebral fracture can be established by imaging, but one must consider the patient's medical history and conduct a physical examination, which may include assessing tenderness over the vertebrae and performing a neurological assessment. Imaging techniques such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computed tomography (CT) scans are commonly employed to evaluate the timing, extent, and involvement of soft tissues or the spinal cord in the fracture. These imaging modalities provide detailed information about the fracture, aiding in the diagnosis and determining the appropriate treatment approach.7

The comprehensive management of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs) involves various components, including pain alleviation, administration of anti‐osteoporosis medication, and surgical interventions like percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) and percutaneous balloon kyphoplasty (BK). These procedures aim to augment the affected vertebrae, provide decompression, and enable structural reconstruction.8 In the short term, VP and balloon BK costs are higher compared to conservative medical management (CMM). However, the analgesic effect is quickly and significantly achieved because the cement stabilization stabilizes the vertebral body upon polymerization. This enables the patient to mobilize rapidly without the requirement of a back brace. Model results indicate that interventional treatments are cost‐effective, particularly among patients who meet the criteria for surgery.9

Balloon kyphoplasty (BK), a minimally invasive technique used to treat osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures, has shown promising results in terms of rapid pain relief and low complication rates. Several studies have found encouraging results in support of this procedure.10 During BK, a balloon is inflated within the affected bone, creating a cavity, which is subsequently filled with cement through an injection. This technique provides the benefit of performing cement augmentation in a controlled and low‐pressure environment, thereby reducing the risk of cement leakage. As a result, it allows for the restoration of vertebral body height and potentially decreases the occurrence of complications related to cement extravasation.11, 12 Perez et al.13 provide support for the safety and efficacy of BK in managing benign vertebral compression fractures even in the presence of a posterior wall defect. While posterior wall defects were previously considered contraindications to BK, carefully selected patients can still experience favorable clinical outcomes and safety with BK in this frequently encountered clinical situation.

PVP was introduced as a minimally invasive treatment option for thoracolumbar burst fractures in patients with preserved neurological function. Nevertheless, the utilization of vertebroplasty in these cases remains a topic of debate. Retropulsed fragments and enhancements in the central spinal canal have been identified as contraindications for vertebroplasty according to certain studies. This is because there is a potential risk of causing further damage to the spinal canal during the procedure.4 The risk of cement leakage in percutaneous vertebroplasty for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures is influenced by two factors: the volume ratio of intravertebral bone cement to the vertebral body and the competence of the vertebral body wall. Cement leakage is more likely to occur when there is vertebral body wall incompetence and a high volume ratio of intravertebral bone cement to the vertebral body.14 According to a systematic review by Zhan et al.15 the incidence of cement leakage in percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) that could potentially result in severe complications is significant. However, by implementing rigorous patient selection criteria and adopting individually tailored therapeutic strategies, the occurrence of cement leakage can be reduced.

Comparison studies were searched regarding BK and PVP in OVCF. Patel et al.16 concluded that both BK and PVP are effective treatments for vertebral compression fractures. Their review suggests that balloon kyphoplasty may be preferred for restoring vertebral height. Similarly, Wang et al. concluded kyphoplasty had specific advantages over vertebroplasty, including reducing the kyphotic wedge angle and the risk of cement leakage, as well as increasing vertebral body height. However, they noted that the radiographic differences did not significantly impact the clinical outcomes. There were no significant differences observed in visual analog scale (VAS) scores and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores between the two treatment groups. Therefore, both BK and PVP were deemed equally effective in terms of clinical outcomes for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCF) in their review. However, comparison studies of these two methods in OVCF with posterior wall defects were not found in the literature.

In a study by Venier et al.8 involving 43 patients with traumatic, osteoporotic, and neoplastic burst fractures, the outcomes of armed kyphoplasty using vertebral body stents or SpineJack were assessed. They concluded that in selected cases, armed kyphoplasty could be a suitable minimally invasive treatment option, either as a stand‐alone procedure or in combination with posterior stabilization.

Cement leakage is recognized as a significant complication of BK, and it is believed that the presence of a posterior vertebral body wall (PVBW) defect increases the risk. In a prospective study of 82 patients by Abdelgawaad et al.,17 it was observed that 22.5% of patients with traumatic vertebral compression fractures and PVBW defects experienced asymptomatic leakage of cement, which could be cortical, discal, or vascular. However, it is noteworthy that no cases of cement leakage into the spinal canal were reported. Furthermore, it is also important to know that the occurrence of intraoperative cement extravasation during the procedure can potentially result in severe neurological injury or pulmonary cement embolism. Although there have been only a limited number of case reports documenting neurological injuries, the estimated incidence of pulmonary cement embolism ranges between 3% and 23%, with the majority of cases having no clinical significance.18, 19 In rare cases, postoperative symptomatic cement leakage may occur, leading to significant neurological complications such as worsening pain, radiculopathy, spinal cord compression, or cauda equina compression.20, 21 Zhang et al.22 analysis found no increased risk of vertebral body fractures, including those adjacent to the treated vertebrae, with minimally invasive surgery compared to conservative treatment.

The successful introduction of kyphoplasty in Nepal marks a significant milestone for the healthcare system in the country. It showcases the dedication of interventional radiologists and the medical community to enhancing treatment options and delivering optimal care to patients with osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures. This pioneering experience in Nepal not only showcases the achievements thus far but also creates opportunities for further research, collaboration, and training, aiming to extend the benefits of this advanced intervention to a larger number of patients in the future. We aim to showcase our ability to effectively manage chronic pain and prevent further fractures in osteoporotic bones. This report serves as a symbolic and informative document.

Due to being a tertiary hospital and referral center, our facility encounters a substantial number of osteoporotic fracture cases on a daily basis. In collaboration with our competent neurosurgeons, we have developed a coordinated approach to treating these cases. Our treatment plan involves kyphoplasty for fractures with posterior cortical defects and vertebroplasty for the remaining cases.

In our setting, it is unfortunate that insurance policies do not cover the cost of the procedure for treating vertebral fractures. This poses a challenge as a significant portion of our population is uninsured and individuals must bear the expenses out of their own pockets. However, it is worth noting that the charges for the procedure are at around 150 USD, which is relatively low compared to US.23 However, making it available to local level is still challenging.

4. CONCLUSION

Percutaneous balloon kyphoplasty demonstrates promising outcomes in the management of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures with posterior cortical defect. It provides pain relief, restores vertebral body height, and has a low risk of cement leakage. Collaboration among various specialties, including orthopedics, radiology, and anesthesia, was critical in achieving the best results. Kyphoplasty should be regarded as a viable option for treating osteoporotic compression fractures, providing significant advantages to patients with pain and restricted mobility as a result of vertebral fractures.

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

Paras Thapa: Conceptualization; writing – original draft; writing – review and editing. Madhur Bhattarai: Writing – original draft; writing – review and editing. Basanta Sharma Paudel: Writing – original draft; writing – review and editing. Prakash Sharma: Writing – review and editing. Pratiksha Kunwar: Writing – review and editing. Sushil Poudel: Writing – review and editing. Saru Koirala: Writing – review and editing. Amit Pradhanang: Supervision; writing – review and editing. Brendan J. Klein: Supervision; writing – review and editing. Farrokh Farrokhi: Supervision; writing – review and editing.

FUNDING INFORMATION

None.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST STATEMENT

The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.

CONSENT

Written informed consent was obtained from the patient to publish this report in accordance with the journal's patient consent policy.

Notes

Thapa P, Bhattarai M, Sharma Paudel B, et al. Early experience with percutaneous balloon kyphoplasty for treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture in Nepal: A case report. Clin Case Rep. 2023;11:e7852. doi: 10.1002/ccr3.7852 [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]

DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT

All the required information is available in the manuscript itself.

REFERENCES

1. Ballane G, Cauley JA, Luckey MM, El‐Hajj FG. Worldwide prevalence and incidence of osteoporotic vertebral fractures. Osteoporos Int. 2017;28(5):1531‐1542. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

2. Patel D, Liu J, Ebraheim NA. Managements of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: a narrative review. World J Orthop. 2022;13(6):564‐573. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

3. Prost S, Pesenti S, Fuentes S, Tropiano P, Blondel B. Treatment of osteoporotic vertebral fractures. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2021;107(1):102779. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

4. Ozsoy KM, Oktay K, Gezercan Y, Cetinalp NE, Okten AI, Erman T. Percutaneous vertebroplasty for the treatment of osteoporotic thoracolumbar fractures with posterior body involved in elderly patients. Turk Neurosurg. 2018;29(1):90‐94. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

5. Tang H, Zhao J, Hao C. Osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures: surgery versus non‐operative management. J Int Med Res. 2011;39(4):1438‐1447. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

6. Watts NB, Harris ST, Genant HK. Treatment of painful osteoporotic vertebral fractures with percutaneous vertebroplasty or kyphoplasty. Osteoporos Int. 2001;12(6):429‐437. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

7. McCarthy J, Davis A. Diagnosis and management of vertebral compression fractures. Am Fam Physician. 2016;94(1):44‐50. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

8. Venier A, Roccatagliata L, Isalberti M, et al. Armed kyphoplasty: an indirect central canal decompression technique in burst fractures. Am J Neuroradiol. 2019;40:1965‐1972. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

9. Hopkins TJ, Eggington S, Quinn M, Nichols‐Ricker CI. Cost‐effectiveness of balloon kyphoplasty and vertebroplasty versus conservative medical management in the USA. Osteoporos Int. 2020;31(12):2461‐2471. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

10. Wang H, Zhang Z, Liu Y, Jiang W. Percutaneous kyphoplasty for the treatment of very severe osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures with spinal canal compromise. J Orthop Surg Res. 2018;13(1):13. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

11. Wardlaw D, Cummings SR, Van Meirhaeghe J, et al. Efficacy and safety of balloon kyphoplasty compared with non‐surgical care for vertebral compression fracture (FREE): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2009;373(9668):1016‐1024. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

12. Van Meirhaeghe J, Bastian L, Boonen S, Ranstam J, Tillman JB, Wardlaw D. A randomized trial of balloon kyphoplasty and nonsurgical management for treating acute vertebral compression fractures: vertebral body kyphosis correction and surgical parameters. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013;38(12):971‐983. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

13. Perez JL, Ozpinar A, Agarwal N, Hacker E, Alan N, Gerszten PC. Safety and efficacy of balloon kyphoplasty for vertebral fractures with posterior wall disruption. Int J Spine Surg. 2021;15(2):353‐358. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

14. Liang D, Ye L, Jiang X, et al. Correlation analysis of cement leakage with volume ratio of intravertebral bone cement to vertebral body and vertebral body wall incompetence in percutaneous vertebroplasty for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures. Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2014;28(11):1358‐1363. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

15. Zhan Y, Jiang J, Liao H, Tan H, Yang K. Risk factors for cement leakage after vertebroplasty or kyphoplasty: a meta‐analysis of published evidence. World Neurosurg. 2017;101:633‐642. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

16. Patel N, Jacobs D, John J, et al. Balloon kyphoplasty vs vertebroplasty: a systematic review of height restoration in osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures. J Pain Res. 2022;15:1233‐1245. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

17. Abdelgawaad AS, Ezzati A, Govindasamy R, Krajnovic B, Elnady B, Said GZ. Kyphoplasty for osteoporotic vertebral fractures with posterior wall injury. Spine J. 2018;18(7):1143‐1148. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

18. Walter J, Haciyakupoglu E, Waschke A, Kalff R, Ewald C. Cement leakage as a possible complication of balloon kyphoplasty—is there a difference between osteoporotic compression fractures (AO type A1) and incomplete burst fractures (AO type A3.1)?Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2012;154(2):313‐319. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

19. Krueger A, Bliemel C, Zettl R, Ruchholtz S. Management of pulmonary cement embolism after percutaneous vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty: a systematic review of the literature. Eur Spine J. 2009;18(9):1257‐1265. [PMC free article] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

20. Lee S‐T, Chen J‐F. Closed reduction vertebroplasty for the treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures. Technical note. J Neurosurg. 2004;100(4):392‐396. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

21. Kasperk C, Hillmeier J, Nöldge G, et al. Treatment of painful vertebral fractures by kyphoplasty in patients with primary osteoporosis: a prospective non‐randomised controlled study. J Bone Miner Res. 2005;20(4):604‐612. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

22. Zhang H, Xu C, Zhang T, Gao Z, Zhang T. Does Percutaneous Vertebroplasty or Balloon Kyphoplasty for Osteoporotic Vertebral Compression Fractures Increase the Incidence of New Vertebral Fractures? A meta‐analysis. Pain Physician. 2017;20(1):E13‐E28. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

23. Ong KL, Lau E, Kemner JE, Kurtz SM. Two‐year cost comparison of vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty for the treatment of vertebral compression fractures: are initial surgical costs misleading?Osteoporos Int. 2013;24(4):1437‐1445. [PubMed] [Google Scholar]

Articles from Clinical Case Reports are provided here courtesy of Wiley

Early experience with percutaneous balloon kyphoplasty for treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture in Nepal: A case report (2024)

FAQs

What is the success rate of balloon kyphoplasty? ›

What is the success rate of kyphoplasty? An estimated 92% of people who undergo kyphoplasty report better pain relief after the procedure.

What is the downside of kyphoplasty? ›

Other risks include infection; leakage of bone cement into the muscle and tissue surrounding the spinal cord and nerve injury that can, in rare instances, cause paralysis; leakage of bone cement into the blood vessels resulting in damage to the blood vessels, lungs and/or heart. This procedure is not for everyone.

How long does it take a compression fracture to heal after kyphoplasty? ›

Kyphoplasty recovery time is typically complete after 6 weeks, so you should be completely recovered by this point. Keeping up with your exercises from physical therapy can help prevent any pain from returning, but you can resume strenuous physical activity at this point.

What happens 3 years after kyphoplasty? ›

Kyphoplasty reduces pain and improves mobility as long as 3 years after the procedure. The long-term risk of new vertebral fractures after kyphoplasty of chronically painful vertebral fractures is reduced versus controls.

How soon can you walk after kyphoplasty? ›

Kyphoplasty Surgery Recovery Time

However, the recovery period can last somewhere between four and six weeks depending on your individual circ*mstances. You may be able to return to physical activity and even work before that point. You'll be able to move around within a few hours of the surgery.

What can you not do after kyphoplasty? ›

Post-procedure activities

Avoid strenuous activity, including bending, pushing, stretching or pulling movements, for several weeks.

Who is not a good candidate for kyphoplasty? ›

Kyphoplasty is not the best procedure when: The fracture already healed. More than 80-90% of the vertebral body has collapsed. You have spinal curvature because of other causes.

When is it too late for kyphoplasty? ›

Some studies have shown that kyphoplasty has better results when performed less than 8 weeks after the fracture occurs. Typically, kyphoplasty will not be performed 12 or more weeks after the fracture because restoration of vertebral height cannot be achieved after the bone has started to significantly heal.

Do you need physical therapy after kyphoplasty? ›

That said, the post-operative period does entail follow-up and physical therapy in many cases, with patients needing to actively participate in their recovery. If you're considering kyphoplasty or are planning on having it done, it's important to understand what life looks like afterward.

How many inches do you lose in a compression fracture? ›

Back pain that starts slowly, and gets worse with walking, but is not felt when resting. Loss of height, as much as 6 inches (15 centimeters) over time.

What is the new treatment for a compression fracture? ›

A spinal implant is a new type of spine cement augmentation procedure that is approved by the Food and Drug Administration for osteoporosis-related compression fractures in the spine.

Can you live a normal life with a compression fracture? ›

In severe cases, daily functions like standing, walking, breathing, and turning your head can become a challenge. The long-term effects of compression fractures can seep into everyday life, making it harder to live unassisted or to keep doing the activities you love.

Is kyphoplasty a permanent fix? ›

Kyphoplasty fixates the compression fracture and is usually permanent.

Why am I in so much pain after kyphoplasty? ›

The findings revealed that 7.8% of the 809 people included in the study still had back pain after the kyphoplasty. Independent risk factors for the continued pain included: having a cavity inside a fractured vertebra. swelling due to fluid being trapped behind the membrane covering the back muscles.

Is there an age limit for kyphoplasty? ›

Most adults of any age are good candidates for kyphoplasty. You may not be able to have the procedure if you have any of the following: Bone infection. Bone fragment in the spinal canal.

What is the next step after failed kyphoplasty? ›

Re-do procedure with vertebroplasty injection of bone cement may be able to alleviate pain by entering the anterior fracture cleft and stabilizing the fracture site.

Is kyphoplasty safe for the elderly? ›

Kyphoplasty is generally considered safe for elderly patients when performed by experienced surgeons. Like any spine surgery, there are potential risks, including infection, bleeding, nerve injury, or adverse reactions to anesthesia.

Top Articles
Latest Posts
Article information

Author: Lidia Grady

Last Updated:

Views: 5886

Rating: 4.4 / 5 (65 voted)

Reviews: 80% of readers found this page helpful

Author information

Name: Lidia Grady

Birthday: 1992-01-22

Address: Suite 493 356 Dale Fall, New Wanda, RI 52485

Phone: +29914464387516

Job: Customer Engineer

Hobby: Cryptography, Writing, Dowsing, Stand-up comedy, Calligraphy, Web surfing, Ghost hunting

Introduction: My name is Lidia Grady, I am a thankful, fine, glamorous, lucky, lively, pleasant, shiny person who loves writing and wants to share my knowledge and understanding with you.